Date: 15th April 2011 at 9:47am
Written by:

It’s the age old discussion point, why a formation should or didn’t work.

For us down the pub, we can discuss the merits of a formation from the first pint, past the crisps and on to the second, third and fourth pint after a game.

We are all experts in our own mind and to us everything can either be blamed or praised on the system used.

One example would be our recent performances playing 4-4-2, so Mick is the system at fault for the performances?

‘It`s not formation. Was everyone thinking playing 4-4-2 was a problem after 20 minutes on Saturday? I don`t think so.’ McCarthy told the Express & Star.

He continued: “I don`t think Phil Neville`s goal came because we were playing 4-4-2. We`ve beaten Chelsea, Liverpool and Manchester City playing 4-4-2, so to change that now would show no consistency.”

For those that think we should perhaps play three at the back?

“Tell them to mind their own business, For all those that think they`re in the know, they should just remember the one time I played three centre-backs at Wolves. It lasted 25 minutes – Chelsea away last season, and we got absolutely pumped 4-0.”

That’s you told, perhaps we should just stick to Football Manager 2011.



Tell us what you think

As well as joining in on the forum and article comments below, you can also write an article to appear on our site!

This website is 100% by the fans and we are always looking for people to get involved. If this interests you please contact Vital Wolves.